62 research outputs found
Revisiting Galison’s ‘Aufbau/Bauhaus’ in light of Neurath’s philosophical projects
Historically, the Vienna Circle and the Dessau Bauhaus were related, with members of each group familiar with the ideas of the other. Peter Galison argues that their projects are related as well, through shared political views and methodological approach. The two main figures that connect the Vienna Circle to the Bauhaus—and the figures upon which Galison focuses—are Rudolf Carnap and Otto Neurath. Yet the connections that Galison develops do not properly capture the common themes between the Bauhaus and Neurath’s philosophical projects. We demonstrate this by considering Neurath’s philosophical commitments. We suggest different connections between Neurath’s projects and the Bauhaus, connections that are both substantive and philosophically interesting
Logics of Temporal-Epistemic Actions
We present Dynamic Epistemic Temporal Logic, a framework for reasoning about
operations on multi-agent Kripke models that contain a designated temporal
relation. These operations are natural extensions of the well-known "action
models" from Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Our "temporal action models" may be used
to define a number of informational actions that can modify the "objective"
temporal structure of a model along with the agents' basic and higher-order
knowledge and beliefs about this structure, including their beliefs about the
time. In essence, this approach provides one way to extend the domain of action
model-style operations from atemporal Kripke models to temporal Kripke models
in a manner that allows actions to control the flow of time. We present a
number of examples to illustrate the subtleties involved in interpreting the
effects of our extended action models on temporal Kripke models. We also study
preservation of important epistemic-temporal properties of temporal Kripke
models under temporal action model-induced operations, provide complete
axiomatizations for two theories of temporal action models, and connect our
approach with previous work on time in Dynamic Epistemic Logic
Defensiveness and Identity
Criticism can sometimes provoke defensive reactions, particularly when it implicates identities people hold dear. For instance, feminists told they are upholding rape culture might become angry or upset, since the criticism conflicts with an identity that is important to them. These kinds of defensive reactions are a primary focus of this paper. What is it to be defensive in this way, and why do some kinds of criticism, or implied criticism, tend to provoke this kind of response? What are the connections between defensiveness, identity, and active ignorance? What are the social, political, and epistemic consequences of the tendency to defensiveness? Are there ways to improve the situation
- …